Tuesday, 8 October 2013

Peer feedback before final Liiar analysis changes and original liiar analysis

Peer feedback – Emily – One of the strengths of your work is that you have focused a lot on the connotations of the magazine, and this is great to show you have a good understanding of representation. You have also written quite a lot for the language section, which is great. For time management you could try and finish all the magazine covers today, so you can focus on the double page spread and contents page. As for presentation, it’s good that you have used an image of the magazine on every slide as this helps the readers to keep relating back to the magazine.


Danielle feedback:

From what you have done you have done a good piece of work. However you could have written more so you could dedicate some much more needed time to your work as you do have a good standard coming along from reading what you have, however there isn’t enough writing there and if you could write more in the way that you are doing that would be great. I your language analysis is also really good and reading through it you can tell you really understand what is going on, think improvements could be writing more and working better with your time, as timing is very important. But despite that you have done well what you do have and if you carry on like that you will have conducted a good LIIAR analysis.


I agree that I need to work better in my time after completing my language slide I understand more now what to write, at first I didn’t know what to write but after getting positive feedback on what I’ve done is right I know I’m along the right lines.


No comments:

Post a Comment